Monday, 27 December 2010

Some Resources

Here is a selection of PDFs and 'browser books' that you may find helpful in the months ahead.

Some 'browser books' first: these open up in Firefox or whatever browser you use.

When in Rome or Rio or Riyadh

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=D8SJJH1U

Guide To Grammar And Writing

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=KAOYINFR

Academic Writing

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=FG39Q1RR

English Idioms Sayings and Slang

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=QHDEEZVA

And here are some books in PDF format that you may find useful:




















Writing at University - A Guide For Students

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=0Y6OLV64




















Academic Writing - A Handbook for International Students

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=T4YAS0H7




















STYLE GUIDE - BBC News Style Guide


http://www.megaupload.com/?d=MVQ42V4L






















STYLE GUIDE - The Economist

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=PIK77OIU




















Routledge Study Guides - Managing Your Learning

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=LF1A2DSP

Managing Your Learning

x

You've had one semester of this undergraduate thing...

Tips for the Terrified



computing

languages

maths

presentations

writing



Some people have a real phobia about the above areas, either because of bad experiences at school, or because they have never done them before. Here, if you need them, are a few basic tips to get you started. Beyond that, seek help from your teacher/trainer or find out if there are any courses or workshops you can enrol on. This is only a beginning…

Computing

  • Find someone to show you. Manuals and help-screens are often as complicated as the program itself, though your institution may have produced a simple guide.
  • Ask him or her to slow down. Computer people tend to do things too quickly.
  • Make sure you can get out of situations as well as into them. Always ask: how do I get back to where I was?
  • Keep a little notebook beside you and write down your own instructions. That way you will understand them properly.
  • Practise each operation two or three times to make sure you can really perform it.
  • Take your time. Speed is not important.
  • Don’t worry, you won’t break it.
  • Work at it regularly, otherwise you will forget.


Languages

  • Do a little often rather than a lot occasionally.
  • Take risks. You will make mistakes but you will learn from them.
  • Listen to tapes to get your ear attuned.
  • Read vocab lists three times: top down, bottom up and top down again. Then test yourself. If the list has more than 10–12 items, divide it in half and do the same.
  • Try imagining one change when you write or speak a sentence (present to past, statement to question, singular to plural, male to female, different adjective, etc). That way you will learn how to vary the patterns.
  • Keep an error book. Note down any repeated mistakes you make and cross them out when you no longer do.
  • Check your work before you hand it in.
  • Have a go.


Maths

  • In maths, if you do it right, you get it right.
  • Make sure you understand every little step. Don’t skip or gloss over
  • anything.
  • Make sure you are doing things in the right order.
  • Keep an error log of the mistakes you make. Cross them out when you no longer do.
  • Try to grasp the underlying principles rather than just jumping through hoops. If you don’t, ask, and if you still don’t, ask again.
  • Understand the purpose of it. Otherwise maths is just meaningless procedures.
  • Take your time. Except in some exams, speed is not important.
  • Check your workings. It is easy to make a slip.
  • Get a feel for the solution. Does it look right?


Presentations

  • Don’t put too much in. Maximum three key points in five minutes, five in ten minutes.
  • Keep a little bit in reserve near the end in case you look like running out.
  • List your main points at the start, preferably on a transparency; make the writing large enough; if you can’t write clearly, print.
  • Speak, don’t read. Have clear, large notes you can see at a glance, maybe on a card.
  • Project your voice and don’t drop it at the ends of sentences.
  • Look at people, and not just the front row.
  • If you want to get a discussion going, present conflicting views.
  • Provide a handout at the end that summarises it all.
  • Have your final sentence worked out so that you exit gracefully.


Writing

  • Make an outline of your essay/assignment first and leave it for a day or so.
  • Say what you are going to say in the introduction.
  • Build up your writing in paragraphs. State your main point at the beginning and then develop it through examples, evidence, questions, arguments and counter-arguments.
  • Don’t feel that the writing must be complicated just because it is an essay. Think: how would I explain this to someone?
  • Don’t let your sentences get too long or you may lose track of them.
  • If you are unsure about spelling, buy a compact dictionary and check.
  • Read a lot. It helps all other communication skills.
  • Don’t try to come to a firm conclusion if there isn’t one.


x

Six Stages of the Essay Writing Process

Stage Six: Editing

If you were snatched away right now by aliens and never seen again, you’d still get a reasonable mark for your writing piece. It’s got plenty of ideas, they’re in the right order, and the whole thing flows without gaps or bulges. However, in the event of an alien abduction it would be comforting to know that you’d left a really superior piece of writing behind. The way to achieve this is through the last step of the writing process: editing.

What is editing, exactly?

Basically ‘editing’ means making your piece as reader-friendly as possible by making the sentences flow in a clear, easy-to-read way. It also means bringing your piece of writing into line with accepted ways of using English: using the appropriate grammar for the purposes of the piece, appropriate punctuation and spelling, and appropriate paragraphing.

Why edit?

I’ve used the word ‘appropriate’ rather than ‘correct’ because language is a living, changing thing and the idea of it being ‘right’ or ‘wrong’ is less important than whether it suits its purpose . . . there’s nothing wrong with those thongs, but maybe not for a job interview! It’s all about being practical. If you use spellings that aren’t the usual ones, or grammar that isn’t what we’ve come to accept as ‘right’, it will distract your readers. Instead of thinking ‘what wonderful ideas this person has’, they’ll think ‘this person can’t spell’. It will break the trance of reading. Readers can be irritated and troubled by unconventional usage (I’ve had dozens of letters from readers about the fact that I don’t use inverted commas around dialogue in some of my novels). It’s your right to make up new ways to do things, but expect to pay a price for it. In the case of a school essay, this price might be a lower mark. (Like everything else about the English language, there are exceptions to this. Imaginative writing often plays fast and loose with accepted ways of using English in order to achieve a particular effect.)

The read-through

As with revising, the first thing to do is to read the piece all the way through, looking for problems. Make a note of where you think there are problems, but don’t stop to fix them. Once you’ve found them all, you can go back and take your time fixing each one. If there’s even the slightest feeling in the back of your mind that something might not be quite right, don’t try to talk yourself out of that feeling.

As writers, we all want our piece to be perfect, so we have a tendency to read it as if it is perfect, with a selective blindness for all its problems. For that reason, this is a good moment to ask someone else to look at it for you. To make a piece as user-friendly as possible, you need to check the piece for style, grammar and presentation.

Editing for style

You made a decision about style back at the start of Stage Four, but in the heat of the moment as you wrote your draft, style might have slipped or changed. You might have forgotten a technical term, or been unable to think of the proper word for something, or you might have got your thoughts tangled up in long complicated sentences. That’s fine—that shows you had your priorities right: get the broad shape of the essay right first, not get bogged down in detail. But now the moment has come to get to grips with all those details of style. The main point about style in an essay is that it should always be the servant of meaning. In an essay, a style that draws attention to itself has failed. The aim of an essay is to get your ideas across strongly and clearly—the style is just the vehicle to convey the ideas.

Questions to ask about style

Have I used the style most appropriate to an essay?

  • An essay should be written in a reasonably formal style. It should be in the third person or the passive voice. ‘I’ is generally not appropriate.

Have I chosen the most appropriate words for this style?

  • To achieve a formal style, individual words shouldn’t be slangy or too casual. You’ll be expected to use the proper technical terms where appropriate. On the other hand, your essay shouldn’t be overloaded with pompous or obscure words. If a simple word does the job, use it.
  • Does the writing give the reader a smooth ride or a bumpy one?
  • In a first draft it’s very easy to get yourself into long complicated sentences containing too many ideas. This is the time to simplify them. Even if a long complicated sentence is grammatically correct, it’s generally awkward and hard to read. Try it out loud—if it’s hard to get it right, or if it sounds clunky, rewrite it. It’s much better to have two or three straightforward sentences than a big baggy monster.
  • On the other hand, the ‘See Spot run’ variety of sentence gets pretty mind-numbing after a while. If you have too many short, choppy sentences you may need to look at ways of connecting some of them, using words such as ‘although’, ‘in addition’, ‘on the other hand’…
  • If all the sentences are constructed exactly the same way, you should look at ways of varying them.

Go back to Stage Four to remind yourself about style.

Editing for grammar

Imaginative writing may have a little latitude with grammar, but an essay has none—the grammar just has to be right.Grammar is a big subject, and for a proper understanding of it, I strongly suggest you get a specialised book on the subject. This is a quick checklist of some of the most common grammatical problems.

Questions to ask about grammar

  • Is this really a complete sentence?
  • Have I joined two complete sentences with only a comma between them?
  • Do my subjects agree with my verbs?
  • Have I changed tense or person without meaning to?
  • Is one bit of my sentence somehow attached to the wrong thing?
  • Have I put enough commas in? Or too many?
  • Have I put apostrophes in the right places?
  • If I’ve used colons and semicolons, have I used them properly?
  • If I’ve used inverted commas and brackets, have I used them properly?
  • Have I put paragraph breaks in the best places?
  • Have I trusted the computer grammar checker too much?

Editing for presentation

Presentation probably shouldn’t matter, but let’s face it, it does. No matter how well-researched and clearly argued your essay is, it (and your mark) will be undermined by spelling mistakes, messy-looking layout or illegible handwriting.
Questions to ask about presentation

Is my spelling correct?

  • You’d think that using a computer spell checker would solve all spelling problems. However, if an incorrect spelling is in fact a legitimate word, the computer won’t always pick it up as a mistake.
  • Be aware, also, that computer spell checkers may also suggest US spellings, which aren’t always the same as Australian ones, and they are very bad at names of people and places.
  • If you’re not using a computer, go through your writing very carefully for spelling. If you have even the faintest shadow of doubt about the spelling of a word, look it up in a dictionary. There are certain words that all of us find hard—words like ‘accommodation’, ‘necessary’, ‘disappoint’—so if you get to a word that you know is often a problem, double-check it even if you think it’s right.
  • Another reader can also be a big help in picking up spelling errors. If there are two perfectly good spellings of a word, choose one and use it consistently.
Does my layout make my piece look good?
  • Layout means the way the text is arranged on the page. Layout makes a huge psychological difference to your reader. A piece that’s crammed tightly on the page with no space anywhere and few paragraph breaks can look dense and uninviting. A piece that’s irregular—different spacing on different parts, different amounts of indentation or different spacing between the lines—looks jerky and unsettling.
  • Your layout should allow plenty of ‘air’ around the text, with generous margins all round.
  • You should leave some space between the lines, too—not only for comments by the teacher, but also because your text is easier on the eye if there’s good separation between the lines.
  • It’s just human nature to prefer something pleasant to deal with and—contrary to some opinions—teachers are, in fact, human. So make sure your piece of writing is as legible as you can make it. If it’s handwritten, write as clearly as you can and don’t let the writing get too small or too sloping. On a computer, stick to one of
  • the standard text fonts (New York or Times New Roman, for example). Don’t use fancy fonts. Use 10- or 12-point type size. If your piece isn’t long enough, the teacher won’t be fooled by 16-point type. Human, yes. Entirely stupid—not usually.

Does my title help the reader enter the essay?

Your essay may have a title: The Water Cycle. Or it may have a heading: Term 2 assignment: ‘What Were the Causes of World War I?’. Whatever the title is, it should tell the reader exactly what the writing task is.

Have I acknowledged other people’s contributions to my essay?

  • Most essay writers use other people’s work to some extent. Sometimes they use it as background reading. Sometimes they specifically use information someone else has gathered or insights someone else has had. Sometimes they actually quote someone else’s words.
  • It’s very important to acknowledge this help, and say exactly where it comes from. This is partly simple gratitude, but it also means that other people can go and check your sources, to find out if, as you claim in your essay, Einstein really did say the earth was flat.
  • You should acknowledge other people’s work in two ways: first, in a bibliography at the end of your essay. This is just a list of all the sources of information that you’ve used. List them alphabetically by author’s surname, with information in this order: author, title, publisher and place and date of publication (or the address of the website).
  • As well as appearing in the bibliography, sources that you’ve used in a direct way should also be acknowledged in the essay itself—for example, ‘As Bloggs points out, Einstein was not always right.’
  • The titles of any books that you refer to should be in italics (if you’re using a computer) or underlined (if you’re writing by hand).

Editing an Essay: 5 steps

1. Read the piece through
  • Don’t stop to fix mistakes, just mark them.
2. Is the style okay?
Ask yourself:
  • Have I chosen the style that’s most appropriate for an essay? (Remember, an essay is aiming to persuade or inform.)
  • Have I chosen particular words that jar with this style? (Check for over-casual, conversational words or ‘ordinary’ words where a technical one would be more appropriate.)
  • Have I chosen to construct sentences in a way that jars with the style? (Look for short, simplistic sentences, also for needlessly pretentious ones.)
3. Is the grammar okay?
Ask yourself:
  • Have I written any sentence fragments?
  • Have I written any run-on sentences?
  • Do my subjects agree with my verbs?
  • Have I changed tense or person?
  • Have I dangled any modifiers?
  • Have I shown the pause I intended by using commas?
  • Have I used apostrophes in the right places?
  • Have I used colons or semicolons correctly?
  • Have I used inverted commas or brackets correctly?
  • Are there plenty of paragraph breaks, and are they in the most natural places?
4. Is the presentation okay?
Ask yourself:
  • Have I checked spellings? (Be careful of sound-alikes such as their/there/ they’re.)
  • Is my layout orderly and well spaced?
  • Have I found the best title for my piece, which prepares the reader for the essay?
  • Have I acknowledged sources of ideas and information in a bibliography?
5. Print out the piece and read it through again
  • Repeat the steps above, if necessary. Then print and read it again.
  • If everything seems OK in the final read-through, the essay is finished.

IN THIS SERIES ABOUT THE ESSAY WRITING PROCESS:

Stage One: Getting Ideas >
Stage Two: Choosing Ideas >
Stage Three: Outling >
Stage Four: Drafting >
Stage Four: Revising >
Stage Six: Editing

Friday, 17 December 2010

LIVE ONLINE DRAFT REVISING EXERCISE


Revise the essay draft below.

  • It uses this structure:

Title
Introduction
Situational Analysis
Career Opportunities
Considerations
Alternatives
Recommendation
Conclusion

  • It is approximately 2,000 words long.
  • Reduce it to about 1,200 by cutting details or examples
  • Some of the information may be presented in the wrong order.
  • Change it as necessary.
  • Some information may have been repeated.
  • Eliminate any repetitions.
  • Can you improve the GOS or the GFS?
  • Correct any errors - grammar, spelling, punctuation.
  • You have approximately 90 minutes to complete this task
  • Submit it to the class blog between 5.30pm and 5.45pm

DURING THIS EXERCISE I WILL BE ONLINE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

YOU WILL BE ABLE TO CONTACT ME BY...

  • YAHOO MESSENGER - my id is farbaloma -
  • or by e-mail: farbaloma@yahoo.com -
  • or through the blog comments -
  • or using the SHOUTMIX feature.

I WILL REFRESH THE BLOG PAGE EVERY 2-3 MINUTES AND WILL SEE YOUR MESSAGES IF THERE ARE ANY.

THESE MESSAGES WILL BE DELETED AFTER THE REVISED DRAFT ESSAYS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED.

I WILL GO OFFLINE AT 4.00pm AND ANY SUBMISSIONS AFTER THAT WILL BE CONSIDERED LATE. FAILURE TO SUBMIT WILL MEAN THAT YOU WILL BE CONSIDERED "ABSENT" FROM THIS SESSION. FAIR ENOUGH?

ENJOY THE CHALLENGE!


Send your revised draft as a Word attachment
to me by e-mail:
farbaloma@yahoo.com



Here is the assignment...

What are the advantages and disadvantages of a dual career marriage? Use a case study to illustrate your answer.

Introduction

Karen and Ross is been married for six years. During these years, each has had to make decisions concerning their careers to accommodate each other. Two companies have now confronted Ross with a career opportunity, those being California Energy Systems and Petrolia Oil. He must decide by September 28 what opportunity to act upon, taking into account the effects it will have on his career, Karen's career, and their marriage.

Situational Analysis

Both individual come from traditional families and are career orientated people. Karen believes the women in her life were career women but this is not entirely true. Her father held an executive job that forced continuous movement. Where as her mother held a 'traditional' position as a school teacher and she was not permitted to have work "interfere with home life and child- rearing responsibilities".

For examples, Ross is responsible for the financial aspects of the home while Karen is responsible for the household chores. At the beginning of the marriage, they attempted to have a "weekend marriage" but this was a great strain and Karen sacrificed her career by finding a job closer to Ross. This demonstrates they are traditional within the marriage, although Karen has an untraditional career.

On a other hand, Ross had a mother who devoted herself to the well-being of her husband with son. Where as his father was a business man that earned a high income, allowing the family to live in a comfortable home with a luxury lifestyle. Karen and Ross appear to be leading a life that is different from their parents but this is not entirely true. It is noteworthy to mention, that each has a traditional role within the marriage. One issue that arises between dual career partners transportation. Who is going to take the car to work and how will the other get to work?

Career Opportunities

As both them Karen and Ross hold dual citizenship in Canada and the United States, they have frequently discussed the possibility of working in Canada. They concluded the Canadian market is less competitive and offers more options than California. However, Karen considers Canadian culture to be slower than U.S. culture concerning the treatment toward women.

On June 1990, a Canadian utility company asked Karen to consider the possibility of joining their company. Upon consideration, Karen became less enthusiastic about the position and decided to decline the offer. Then in mid September, California Randle Corporation offered her a job in the organizational development department. This position would provide an increase in salary, double responsibility, and a great opportunity to learn and advance. The Bank of Ontario also interviewed her for a junior position and told Karen an opportunity might open later in the year.

Simultaneous, Ross reluctantly extended his own job search to Ontario. Both the Bank of Ontario and Petrolia Oil offered him positions. The position at Petrolia Oil offered a major salary increase, a chance to work in a new and challenging field, and a request to begin work November 1. At the same time, he received an offer from Cal Eng. to join the Personnel Department. This position would represent a sizeable pay increase but only a lateral move in responsibility.

As mentioned earlier, both Karen and Ross come from traditional families. It is evident their upbringing is playing a significant role in their lives today. For example, within the home Karen is responsible for the household chores while Ross is responsible for the household finances. Therefore, it can be predicted that Ross will decline the offer from Cal Eng. and accept the offer with Petrolia Oil in Toronto. Since Karen already sacrificed her career when she moved closer to Ross, it can be anticipated she will do the same in this situation.

Considerations

The finally issue that must be considered in dual-career marriages is children. At this time, Karen does not have any children and Ross has one from a previous marriage. Talking about what will happen if Karen becomes pregnant is important and they must take time to discuss this issue. They must consider areas such as who will stay home with the child after birth, will the children go to day care, and whose career desires will have to be put on hold when the child is born.

All of this issues must be considered before any couple marries to prevent problems from arising later. Both Karen and Ross have already been through one marriage and they can attribute this to the work styles each hold. Unfortunately, they only dated for a short time before marriage and there was no indication these factors were considered. Before Ross makes any decision about his career, it is important they discuss these issues.

In all dual career marriage, problems or issues must be considered. One issue that arises between dual career partners transportation. Who is going to take the car to work and how will the other get to work? This is only a minor concern and can easily be resolved. Another concern is the increase in money they will earn. Karen and Ross must consider who will be responsible for managing the funds. For example, will each maintain their own income or is it pooled together. Presently, Ross manages the finances for the home but each maintains their own accounts, contributing equally to the home. They must then decide where the money will be spent and invested. Again this is only a minor concern and can easily be addressed. However, there are more serious issues and problems that must be considered in dual-career marriages.

To begin, Karen and Ross must arrange how they will divide the household responsibilities. As both partners are busy with work, they must divide the responsibilities evenly. For example, the couple must decide who will be responsible for the laundry, grocery shopping, cleanliness of the house, and meals. The division of responsibilities should not leave one feeling as if they are holding down two jobs. Karen and Ross have been married for six years. During these years, each has had to make decisions concerning their careers to accommodate each other.

Ross is responsible for the financial aspects of the home while Karen is responsible for the household chores. At the beginning of the marriage, they attempted to have a "weekend marriage" but this was a great strain and Karen sacrificed her career by finding a job closer to Ross.

Today, jobs are demanding and stressful. This leaves a twofold affect on dual-career marriages. First, employers expect employees to work sixty to seventy hours a week, leaving little time for oneself. If two people are working this many hours, it makes it difficult to spend quality time with each other. Luckily , Karen and Ross realize the need for time together and take the time to plan quality time with each other. The other side of jobs today is the increase in stress among individuals. Since both partners are experiencing this stress, it is necessary for them to learn to cope with the stress and prevent it from entering the marriage.

With both people working in the marriage, they can assume that each will have different goals, aspirations, and missions. Recognizing and accepting the differences between each other's is important. If both parties want to be successful with their careers, while maintaining their marriage, they must support each others goals, aspirations and missions. If they do not support each other, then one may have to give up part of their career or the marriage may end.

Alternatives

There are many options available to Ross in respect to his career. To begin, he could choose to accept the job with Cal Eng. This job will provide him with a sizeable pay increase but will only be a lateral move in his career. The advantages of this option are the increases in pay and the ability to remain in California. As his parents are in the Bay area, the job with Cal Eng. will permit him to remain close to them. Another positive side to this option is Karen's career. As California Randle Corporation has offered Karen a position, this will provide her with the opportunity to further her career. At the same time, she will have the opportunity to learn, advance her career, and receive an increase in salary.

An additional option available to Ross is accepting the job with Petrolia Oil in Toronto. In respect to his career, this position will provide him with a new and challenging field, while receiving an increase in pay. Unfortunately, this alternative may or may not further Karen's career. At this time, a utility firm has offered her a position and the Bank of Ontario has interviewed her for a junior position. After considering the offer from the utilities firm, she has concluded she would not like to work with the company and the position with the Bank of Ontario is not definite. Also, as stated before, Karen finds the treatment of women in Canada to be behind that of the United States. On a positive note, OD field in Canada is less competitive and therefore provides more options than in California.

Recommendation

Another possible alternative for Ross is to decline the offer with Cal Eng. Instead, he could remain at his present job while looking for another. This will allow Karen to accept the position with Randle Corporation and permit Ross to remain close to his family. Unfortunately, this option may leave Ross feeling unsatisfied with his career, which could lead to problems within the marriage.

Ideally, it is recommended Ross either take the job with Cal Eng. or remain at his current job, continuing his job hunt. This will allow him to remain in California and close to his parents. In addition, this will allow Karen to further her career. Unfortunately, this is probably not what Ross will choose.

As mentioned earlier, both Karen and Ross come from traditional families. It is evident their upbringing is playing a significant role in their lives today. For example, within the home Karen is responsible for the household chores while Ross is responsible for the household finances. Therefore, it can be predicted that Ross will decline the offer from Cal Eng. and accept the offer with Petrolia Oil in Toronto. Since Karen already sacrificed her career when she moved closer to Ross, it can be anticipated she will do the same in this situation.

Conclusion

Although Karen sacrificed her career before, this alternative will probably lead to long term problems. To begin, Karen does not know if she definitely has a job in Toronto and therefore might not want to relocate in Canada. However, Ross can probably convince her of the benefits that exist in Toronto. For example, he can point out the OD market in Canada is less competitive and therefore can provide her with ample opportunities. Once she gets to Canada, she may not find a job that suits her desires. This in turn may leave her feeling unhappy with her career, which could lead to her resenting Ross for moving to Toronto. If this does happen, the marriage will probably end.

In conclusion, it is recommended Ross and Karen sit down and discuss the problems and issues that arise in dual-career marriages. From this, they should decide together what Ross should do. This will allow a win/win situation and thus both should be satisfied with the outcome.

On a positive note, she might be able to find a suitable job in Canada since competition is lower and she is highly qualified. Also, the lifestyle in Canada is slower than the United States lifestyle. This will allow Karen and Ross to get their marriage back on track as the two began their marriage with a weekend marriage. Even though this later changed, the two do not appear to be spending a great deal of time together.


Submit your revised draft by e-mail before 4pm. If you run out of time, just submit what you have done, or let me know the reason for the delay.

Thursday, 16 December 2010

Six Stages of the Essay Writing Process

Stage Five: Revising

You’ve now got a piece of writing instead of a blank page and a sinking feeling in your stomach. You know that what you’re supposed to do now is revise it. But what does revising really mean? Revising literally means ‘re-seeing’. It is about fixing the bigger, structural problems and, if necessary, ‘re-seeing’ the whole shape of the piece. What this boils down to is finding places where you need to cut something out, places where you should add something, and places where you need to move or rearrange something. Revising doesn’t mean fixing surface problems such as grammar and spelling. That’s what’s called ‘editing’, and we’ll get to that in Stage Six.

Two-step revising

There are two quite different things you have to do when revising. It’s tempting to try to do them both at the same time, but it’s quicker in the long run to do them one by one. The first thing is to find the problems. The second thing is to fix them.

Finding problems

Coming to your own work fresh is one of the hardest things about writing. Somehow, you have to put aside everything you know about the background of the piece—what you intended, the real situation it might be based on—and react to what you’ve actually got on the paper. If you want to find problems before your readers do, you have to try to read it the way they will. That means reading it straight through without stopping, to get a feeling for the piece as a whole. Read it aloud if you can—it will sound quite different and you’ll hear where things should be changed.

Don’t waste this read-through by stopping to fix things, but read with a pen in your hand. When you come to something that doesn’t quite feel right, put a squiggle in the margin beside it, then keep reading. Trust your gut feeling. If you feel that there’s something wrong—even if you don’t know what it is—your readers will too. Time helps you come to a piece freshly. Even fifteen minutes— while you take the dog for a walk—helps you get some distance on what you’ve written.

If you’re working on a computer, I strongly recommend that you print it out (double-spaced) before you start revising. Things always look better on the screen—more like a finished product. But right now you don’t want them to look any better than they really are— you want to find problems, not hide them.

The first time you read the piece through, think only about these questions:

  • Have I repeated myself here or waffled on?
  • Is there something missing here?
  • Are parts of this in the wrong order?

Fixing problems

After you’ve read the piece through, go back to each of the squiggles you made, and work out just why it didn’t sound right.

  • If you repeated something, you need to cut.
  • If you’re missing something, you’ll need to add.
  • If parts are in the wrong order, you’ll need to move things around.

If the problem is something else—spelling or grammar, for example—leave it for the moment. You’ll fix those in Stage Six.

The Great Opening Sentence (GOS)

Now it is time to replace your ‘summary’ sentence with a GOS. A GOS should get your reader interested, but not give too much away. A good GOS will often make the reader ask ‘Why?’—then they’ll read on, to find the answer to that question.

There are two ways to come up with a GOS. One way is to find it. It may be embedded somewhere in your piece, already written—read through the piece, auditioning each sentence (or part of it) for a starring role as a GOS. Or you may find it somewhere else—a sentence in another piece of writing may suggest a GOS, or the sentence may be useable as a direct quote.
The other way to produce a GOS is to write it. Approach this in the same way as you got ideas in Step One—let your mind think sideways and don’t reject any suggestions. Write down all the openers you can dream up, no matter how hopeless they seem.

When you’ve got a page covered with attempts, circle the ones that seem most promising—or just a good phrase or word—and build on these. Assume that you’ll write many GOS attempts before you come up with a good one.

The Great Final Sentence (GFS)

It’s time to get that right, too. A GFS should leave the reader feeling that all the different threads of the piece have been drawn together in a satisfying way. A piece might end with a powerful final statement, or in a quiet way. In either case, the reader should feel sure this is the end—not just that there’s a page missing. As with the GOS, you may find your GFS hiding somewhere in what you’ve already written, or you may need to write one from scratch. Go about it in the same way as you did for the GOS.

Revising your essay

An essay will generally be aiming to give the readers information, or persuade them of something. As you read through your draft, you’ll be looking for changes that will help readers understand the information better or be more convinced by your argument. Once you’ve found the places that need fixing, you have to decide whether to cut, add or move.

Cutting

Here are some things that might need cutting:

  • padding—too little information or argument taking up too much space;
  • waffle—pompous or over-elaborate sentences with no real purpose;
  • repeated ideas or information;
  • irrelevant material (even if it’s brilliant or took you hours to write, it has to address the assignment);
  • words, sentences or even whole ideas if the essay is longer than required.

Adding

Here are some things that might need be added:

  • information that you’ve assumed but not actually stated (don’t rely on the reader to fill the gaps);
  • a step in your argument that you’ve left out;
  • details or explanations that show how your ideas relate to the assignment;
  • connectors or pointers that smooth the flow between your ideas;
  • the introduction and conclusion: this is the moment to compose a GOS and a GFS.

Moving

Here are some things that might need to be moved around:
  • information that’s not in the most logical order (for example, from most important to least important, most distant in time to most recent, or any order that works and is consistent);
  • information that’s important but is given to the reader at the wrong time (for example, background information that should go before the main argument);
  • steps in an argument that are not, in the most logical order (an argument has to build up step by step, with the evidence for each step, and then a final, convincing statement);
  • something that is good in itself but interrupts the flow;
  • the arrangement in a twopronged essay; you may decide now that you made the wrong choice and need to rearrange some of the parts.

Other ways to revise

Sometimes cutting, adding or moving doesn’t quite do the trick. If that’s the case, put the draft away and simply tell someone (real or imaginary) what it’s about. Then tell them the contents of each paragraph, one by one. (You might start with words like ‘What I’m saying here is…’) Then write down what you’ve just heard yourself say. Those words will give you a clear, simply-worded version of your essay which you can then embellish with details from your written draft.

Revising ‘too much’

It’s easy to talk yourself out of the need to make changes. On a second reading some of the problems appear to melt away. You’ve got to remember, though, that most pieces don’t get a second reading.

Nevertheless, as you continue your revisions, you might decide you were right in an earlier version and you need to go back to that. It’s a good idea not to delete or throw away any parts of your earlier drafts—keep them somewhere, in case. (For computer work, make a copy before you start changing it.)

Don’t worry about ‘overworking’ a piece until you’ve revised it at least three times. An overworked essay is a rare and seldomsighted creature.

Strange though it seems, revising can actually be the best part of writing. You’ve done the hard work—you’ve actually created an essay out of thin air. You don’t have to do that again. Now you can enjoy tinkering with it, adding here, cutting there—getting the whole thing as good as you can make it.

Six Steps to Revising an Essay

1. Make a copy of the first draft

  • This is so you can scribble on this one to your heart’s content.
  • Space it generously—then you can read it easily.

2. Read it through pretending that someone else wrote it

  • Don’t stop and fix things.
  • If something sounds wrong, just mark it with a squiggle on this first reading.
  • Don’t stop to work out why it sounds wrong.

3. Consider making cuts

Ask yourself:

  • Is this essay longer than required?
  • Have I padded it to make it up to length?
  • Have I waffled on pompously and got tangled up in long, complex sentences?
  • Have I repeated myself?
  • Have I included material that doesn’t connect to the assignment?

If so, write CUT against each squiggle that flags repetition, long-windedness or irrelevance.

4. Consider adding something

Ask yourself:

  • Have I assumed that my readers know something I haven’t actually said?
  • Have I left out a step in my argument?
  • Have I left out an important piece of information?
  • Have I failed to show how something is relevant to the topic?
  • Have I got ideas that seem disconnected, and need to be joined?
  • Have I failed to give supporting material for a point I’ve made?
  • Do I need to add a GOS or a GFS?

If so, write ADD.

5. Consider moving parts around

Ask yourself:

  • Is this information relevant, but not in a logical sequence?
  • Is this idea relevant, but not a step in this particular argument?
  • Have I introduced information at the wrong time (too early, before its relevance can be shown: too late, after the reader needed it)?
  • For a two-pronged essay, have I chosen the best way of arranging the material?

Write MOVE against the parts that need it.

6. What if you can see a problem but not how to fix it?

Ask yourself:

  • Is it that I can’t bring myself to cut something out?
  • >>> Solution: tell yourself a little white lie: you’ll find a place for it ‘in a minute’.
  • Is it that I can’t think of anything to add?
  • >>> Solution: go back to the idea-starters in Step One, especially research. Also, go back to the assignment and read it again.
  • Am I afraid I’ll get into a worse muddle when I move things around?
  • >>> Solution: cut the essay up, physically, and spread the bits out on the table. Then sticky-tape the pieces together in the new order. Primitive, but it works!
  • Are the ideas in the right order but still sound jerky?
  • >>> Solution: use connecting phrases such as ‘On the other hand…’, ‘In addition…’.
  • Is it that I can’t think of a GOS?
  • >>> Solutions:
  • look for a brief, punchy quote to open with;
  • open with a question;
  • open with a dramatic contrast or contradiction.
  • Is it that I can’t think of a GFS?
  • >>> Solutions:
  • If you haven’t done so for a GOS, end with a strong quote;
  • refer back to the assignment—not by quoting the whole thing, but by using one or two words from it.
  • Be prepared to have several attempts at a GOS and a GFS.

IN THIS SERIES ABOUT THE ESSAY WRITING PROCESS:

Previously… Stage One: Getting Ideas > Stage Two:Choosing Ideas > Step Three: Outling > Step Four: Drafting

The next one (and the last one)… Step Six: Editing

Tuesday, 14 December 2010

Corruption in Indonesia

The adventures of SuperGayus

A rogue tax official enthralls and appals a rapt nation

Nov 18th 2010 | JAKARTA | from PRINT EDITION



Indonesia's Mount Merapi

Dangerously hot air

A capricious volcano, but fears ease of another Pompeii

Nov 11th 2010 | Jakarta | from PRINT EDITION


VOCABULARY BUILDING - Module 10

10. 1

1. rendered, 2. Anthropology, 3. triangle, 4. intimacy,
5. sift, 6. surplus, 7. repress, 8. province, 9. foetus, 10. quote

10. 2

1. procure, 2. appendix, 3. assimilate, 4. channel,
5. liberated, 6. evoke, 7. diverge, 8. torture,
9. intrinsic, 10. accumulated

10. 3

1. i, 2. g, 3. c, 4. a, 5. f, 6. d, 7. j, 8. e, 9. k, 10. h, 11. b

10. 4

1. inconsistent, 2. ascribed, 3. embrace, 4. emancipate,
5. enhance, 6. comprises, 7. assent, 8. outcome,
9. saturated, 10. vague, 11. interrelated

10. 5

1. eloquent, 2. deliberate, 3. skeleton, 4. compulsion,
5. perpetual, 6. elicit, 7. removed, 8. enrich, 9. episodes,
10. resident, 11. recur

10. 6

1. health clinic, 2. High inflation, 3. television interviews,
4. leading exponents, 5. maternal instinct, 6. political ambitions, 7. null and void,
8. tangible benefits, 9. have access to,
10. fossil fuels, 11. under the auspices of

Six Stages of the Essay Writing Process

Stage Four: Drafting

One of the occupational diseases of writers is putting off the dreaded moment of actually starting to write. It’s natural to want to get it right first time, but that’s a big ask, so naturally you put it off some more. However, unless you’re sitting for an exam, you can do as many drafts as you need to get it right. (Some of us do quite a number: my last novel was up to draft 24 when I gave it to the publishers.) First drafts are the ones writers burn so no one can ever know how bad they were.

Only a first draft

Redrafting can seem like a chore, but you could also see it as a freedom. It means that this first draft can be as rough and ‘wrong’ as you like. It can also be (within reason) any length. In Step Five you’ll add or cut as you need to, to make it the right length, so you don’t need to worry about length at the moment. Writing is hard if you’re thinking, ‘Now I am writing my piece.’ That’s enough to give anyone the cold horrors. It’s a lot easier if you think, ‘Now I am writing a first draft of paragraph one. Now I am writing a first draft of paragraph two.’ Anything you can do to make a first draft not feel like the final draft will help. Writing by hand might make it easier to write those first, foolish sentences. Promising yourself that you’re not going to show this draft to a single living soul can help, too. But the very best trick I know to get going with a first draft is this: Don’t start at the beginning.

The GOS factor

The reason for this is the GOS factor. This is the knowledge that our piece has to have a Great Opening Sentence—one that will grip the reader from the very first moment. Probably the hardest sentence in any piece of writing is the first one (the next hardest is the GFS—the final one). Starting with the hardest sentence—the one with the biggest expectations riding on it—is enough to give you writer’s block before you’ve written a word. Years of my life were wasted staring at pieces of paper, trying to think of a GOS. These days, instead of agonising about that GOS, I just jot down a one-line summary to start with. I don’t even think about the GOS until I’ve written the whole piece. In Step Five (page 139) there’s some information about how you might write a GOS—but you don’t need it yet. No matter where you start and whatever the piece is about, you need to decide how the piece should be written—the best style for its purposes. Let’s take a minute to look into this idea of style.

About style

Style is a loose sort of concept that’s about how something is written rather than what is written. Choosing the best style for your piece is like deciding what to wear. You probably wouldn’t go to the school formal in your trackies and trainers, and it’s not likely you’d go to the gym in your silk and satin. In the same way, you wouldn’t use the same language for every situation. It all depends on what the piece of writing is for.

Choosing an appropriate style

For an essay, you’re trying to persuade or inform your reader. Therefore, you’ll want to choose a style that makes it as persuasive or informative as possible. You want to sound as if you know what you’re talking about, and that you have a considered, logical view of the assignment rather than an emotional response. Even for an essay in which you’re taking sides and putting forward an argument, you’ll be basing it on logic, not emotion.

This sense of your authority is best achieved by a fairly formal and impersonal style. You would probably choose:

  • reasonably formal words (not pompous ones, though);
  • no slang or colloquial words;
  • no highly emotional or prejudiced language;
  • third-person or passive voice (no ‘I’);
  • sentences that are grammatically correct and not overly simple (but not overly tangled, either).

In a first draft, aim for these features if you can, but don’t get paralysed by them. It’s better to go back and fix them up later (Step Six shows you how) than not to be able to write a first draft at all because you’re too worried about getting it perfect.



You can see from this that style boils down to three factors: word choice, voice and sentence structure. We’ll look at each of those one by one.

Choice of words

English is well-supplied with synonyms—different words that mean the same thing. They may mean the same, but you’d choose different ones for different purposes.

  • The average kitchen contains quite a few cockroaches.
  • The average kitchen contains heaps of cockroaches.
  • The average kitchen contains numerous cockroaches.

If you were aiming to be convincing, factual and authoritative, you’d probably use ‘numerous’. If you were aiming to be chatty and friendly, you might choose ‘heaps’. If you were aiming for somewhere in between, you might use ‘quite a few’. Whichever one you choose is a matter of judging which one will serve your purposes best. That means thinking about the purpose of your piece and who will be reading it.

Voice

Listen to the following sentences. Who’s speaking in each one?

  • I hate all kinds of bugs.

This sounds personal and close up, like a person talking directly to you. It’s called the first person narrator because an ‘I’ is speaking.

  • You (reader) hate all kinds of bugs.

This narrator is telling you about yourself. This is the second person because the narrator is speaking to a second person, ‘you’. Sometimes the ‘you’ is not actually said, but it’s there in the background, and then it sounds as if the ‘you’ is being given an order. For example, ‘Sit down’—the ‘you’ is there but not actually said. This is called the imperative (meaning ‘what you must do’).

  • He [or she] hates all kinds of bugs.

This narrator is talking about other people. It’s a sort of ‘onlooker’. This is the third person (it’s talking about things happening to a third person—a ‘he’ or a ‘she’).

  • One hates all kinds of bugs.

This is when you’re talking about yourself, but in a disguised way—you’re speaking about yourself as if you’re a third person— you want to stay hidden behind a third person’s mask.
This can also be used to show that you’re speaking about people in general—to give the idea that it’s a universal truth—for example, ‘To make an omelette, one must break eggs.’

Sometimes we use ‘you’ as a more informal version of this ‘universal’ narrator, so it doesn’t sound quite so pompous—for example, ‘To make an omelette, you must break eggs.’

  • Bugs are hated.

This sentence doesn’t tell us who hates bugs; someone does but the narrator has not told us. The narrator has rearranged the words so that bugs are the subject and focus of attention in the sentence. This is called the passive voice. Computer grammar checks seem to hate the passive voice, but it has its uses. It has a certain authority. It also allows the writer to hide information from the reader—in the example above, we aren’t told who hates bugs.

You can see from these examples that the choice you make will have a big effect on the way readers respond.

  • If you want your readers to be charmed, to feel relaxed, to like you, you’d probably use the personal, chatty, first-person ‘I’ narrator. You might use the personal voice in a letter or for a piece of imaginative writing, for example.
  • If you want them to be convinced by you and believe what you’re saying, you’d choose a less personal narrator with more authority—the third person. You would probably use third person in an essay or a report because of its confident and objective feel.
  • If you want to shift the emphasis of the sentence away from the person acting, or to the action itself, you might use the passive voice. For example, in a scientific report you might say, ‘A test tube was taken’ or ‘Four families were interviewed’.

Sentence structure or syntax

Syntax just means the way you put your words together to make sentences. The simplest kind of sentence has a grammatical subject, a verb and an object: ‘I (subject) hate (verb) bugs (object).’ This arrangement can be varied. Sometimes you want to do something more elaborate like adding clauses and phrases, or changing the usual order of words. My house is full of bugs, which I hate. Bugs! I hate them. I hate bugs, although my house is full of them. Although my house is full of bugs, I hate them; however ants are different—I find them rather cute. at the
How to decide on the best style for your piece

Okay—so you can make a piece sound different depending on what style you choose. But how do you know what style is right for a particular piece of writing? The answer is to go back and look again at what your piece of writing is trying to do.

If a piece of writing is mainly setting out to entertain, you need to ask what style will be most entertaining for this particular piece.

If a piece of writing is setting out to persuade, you need to ask what style will be most persuasive.

If you’re setting out to inform, you need to ask what style will be best to convey information.


So, work out what your piece of writing is trying to do, then choose the best style for that purpose and write in it.

What if I can only think of one style?

Writing in different styles for different purposes assumes that you can choose between several ways of saying something. It assumes, for example, that you can think of another word for ‘heaps’ if you’re writing an essay. But maybe you can’t think of another way to say it.
One solution is to go to a thesaurus and try to find a similar word. This is okay in theory but the thesaurus won’t tell you whether the word you find is going to fit with the tone of your piece. It doesn’t know what kind of piece you’re writing.

A different way is to use the actor all of us have inside ourselves. Try this: if you can only think of ‘heaps’, and you know it’s too slangy for your essay, pretend you’re a school principal or the prime minister and say your sentence in the tone of voice and words you’d imagine them using. If you can only think of ‘numerous’, but you want your piece to sound relaxed and chatty, try pretending you’re on the phone to your best friend and say the sentence in the sort of words you’d probably use to him or her.

Using your outline

As you write, you might see ways to improve or add to your outline. Change it, but make sure it’s still addressing the assignment and moving in a logical way from point to point. Don’t let yourself be drawn down paths that aren’t relevant to the assignment.

Keeping the flow going

Postpone that intimidating GOS—Great Opening Sentence. Instead, use the one-line summary of your basic idea that you put at the head of your outline in Step Three. This sentence won’t appear in the final essay—it’s probably pretty dull. You’ll think of a more interesting way to start the essay in Step Five. Plunge in and try not to stop until you’ve roughed-out the whole piece. If you can’t think of the right word, put any word you can think of that is close to what you want to convey. If you’re desperate, you can always leave a blank. If you’ve forgotten a date or a name, leave a blank and come back to it later. Get spelling and grammar right if you can—but don’t let those things stop you. Don’t go back and fix things. Rough the whole thing out now and fix the details later.

Getting stuck

The Beginning of an essay is often a hard place to start. It’s where the central issue of the essay is presented—whether it’s a body of information about a subject, or a particular argument. Sometimes it’s hard to write this before you’ve written the whole piece. If you’re finding this is the case, write the Middle first. Come back later when you can see what you’ve done and tackle the Beginning. (In “Stage Five – Revising”, next week, there’s some information about getting that GOS right, but you don’t actually need it now.)

How to end it

Ending an essay can be almost as hard as starting it. The pressure is on for that Great Final Sentence to be—well—great. Take the pressure off for now. Just draw together the points you’ve made in the best final paragraph you can. You’ll probably need more than one try before you get it exactly right—don’t spend too much time on it now. (Step Five is the time for that.)Don’t give this to a reader yet. It’s rough, and they might not be able to see past the roughness to the shape underneath. Revise it first (Step Five), otherwise you might be unnecessarily discouraged.

First Draft For an Essay: 7 steps

1. Remind yourself of the ‘essay style’
Aim to use:
  • • formal, non-slangy words;
  • • third person or, for certain kinds of essays, passive voice;
  • • grammatically correct sentences that aren’t too simplistic.

2. Write out each card on your outline
  • • Start with your one-line summary of the piece. (But remember it won’t appear like this in the final draft—this is just to give you a run-up. When you’ve written the essay out, you can come back and think of a better way to start it.)
  • • The idea is to expand each card into a paragraph (or several paragraphs).
  • • In general, each card should be a new paragraph (this might not be true of the Beginning and End sections).

3. Structure each paragraph
Use:
  • • a topic sentence which says what the paragraph will be about;
  • • a development which gives more details, in a few sentences;
  • • evidence which gives examples or other supporting material.

4. Link each paragraph to the assignment
Ask yourself:
  • • How does this help to address the assignment I’ve been given?
  • • How can I show that it addresses the assignment?
  • • How can I connect this paragraph to the one before?

5. What if you can’t think of how to expand on a card?
Ask yourself:
  • • Should this idea be in the essay after all?
  • • Do I need to find out some more information? If so, more research might give you what you need.
  • • Does this point need some support or proof? If so, go and look for some. If you can’t find anything, consider whether you should still include that point.

6. What if you get stuck?
Ask yourself:
  • • Am I feeling anxious because this doesn’t sound like an essay?
  • >>> (Solution: it’s not an essay yet. It’s only a first draft. Give it time.)
  • • Am I having trouble thinking of the right word or right spelling?
  • >>> (Solution: for the moment, just find the best approximation you can. Fix it up later.)
  • • Am I stuck because I’ve forgotten a date or name or technical term?
  • >>> (Solution: leave a blank and look it up when you’ve finished writing this draft.)
  • • Am I stuck because my sentence has become long and tangled up in itself?
  • >>> (Solution: cut the sentence up into several short, simpler ones.)
  • • Do I keep going back and re-reading what I’ve done?
  • >>> (Solution: just press ahead and get it all down before you go back.)
  • • Is there another card further down the outline that would be easier to write about?
  • >>> (Solution: leapfrog down to that card. Start the writing for it on a new page, though, and don’t forget to go back later and fill in the gap.)
  • • Do I keep losing sight of how each idea is relevant?
  • >>> (Solution: use key words from the assignment in each topic sentence.)

7. What if the essay changes direction?
  • This is common, so don’t panic—although a well-planned outline help prevent it.
  • Once you can see the new direction, stop writing and go back assignment. Would this new direction be a better way to the assignment after all?
  • If you think so, go back to the index cards. Add new ones for ideas, cut out any that no longer fit, and rearrange the rest need to.
  • Resume writing using the new outline and remind yourself more time outlining the next time you write an essay.


IN THIS SERIES ABOUT THE ESSAY WRITING PROCESS:

Previously… Stage One: Getting Ideas > Stage Two: Choosing Ideas > Step Three: Outling

To follow… Step Five: Revising > Step Six: Editing

Saturday, 27 November 2010

A Poem

hurtling lovers
in these deep dark hours
hasty rain
on thirsty flowers
desperate wishes
for some stolen nights
no one knows what is wrong
or what is right

add up your sorrows
and fly them like some flags
feel the wind as
it blows them ragged
it’s more than water
in a bruised angel’s eyes
dashed on the rocks
of a lover’s lies

these fragile secrets
oh they burn us if untold
which one to wager
and which one to fold
add up your sorrows
and dry them in your eyes
memorize the flowers
as they curl up and die

we brandish our bruises
like immaculate fools
why do we cherish
the things that we lose?
why do we cherish
the things that we bruise?
why can't we cherish
the things that are true?

Friday, 26 November 2010

Pan Am - Ending in tragedy - Brand Failure 3

In the 1980s, Pan American World Airways, or Pan Am, was one of the most famous brands of airline on the planet. For more than 60 years it had pioneered transocean and intercontinental flying.

Having begun life in 1927 with a few aircraft and a single route from Key West to Havana, Pan Am came to represent US commercial aviation policy overseas.

However, in the late 1980s the company started to struggle to achieve goals and performance began to slip.

Then, in 1988, disaster struck. A Pan Am plane on route from London to New York disappeared from radar somewhere above Scotland. Later it emerged that a bomb had gone off in the cargo area, causing the aircraft to break in two.

The main body of the plane carried on for 13 miles before coming to ground in the small Scottish village of Lockerbie. The total search area spanned 845 square miles and debris turned up as far as 80 miles from Lockerbie.

In total, 270 people were killed, including 11 on the ground. One witness told television interviewers ‘the sky was actually raining fire.’

The horrific nature of the tragedy, the fact that everybody knew that the airline involved was Pan Am, and also the international nature of the story, meant that the Pan Am name was tarnished and could never recover.

Despite the company’s constant promises of commitment to increasing its airline’s security, the public was simply not willing to fly with Pan Am anymore.

After three years of flying with empty seats, in 1991 the company went bankrupt and shut down.

This all goes to show that some crises are too big to recover from. Pan Am handled the Lockerbie disaster as best as it could, but the decline in public confidence proved too much.

Compulsory Voting

WHAT ARE THE ARGUMENTS FOR AND AGAINST MAKING VOTING COMPULSORY?

In many countries around the world individuals can choose to vote, or not to vote, as they see fit. In some countries (Australia, Switzerland and Singapore, for example) it is compulsory to vote in elections. The proposition in this debate must advocate some sort of punishment as an enforcement mechanism - a fine equivalent to about 100 US dollars is the norm. In some countries a no-vote box is available on the ballot paper, which can be crossed by those who do not wish to vote for any of the candidates standing.

The Argument For

In all democracies around the world voter apathy is highest among the poorest and most excluded sectors of society. Since they do not vote the political parties do not create policies for their needs, which leads to a vicious circle of increasing isolation. By making the most disenfranchised vote the major political parties are forced to take notice of them. An example of this is in the UK where the Labour party abandoned its core supporters to pursue ‘middle England’.

A high turnout is important for a proper democratic mandate and the functioning of democracy. In this sense voting is a civic duty like Jury service. Jury service is compulsory in order that the courts can function properly and is a strong precedent for making voting compulsory.

The right to vote in a democracy has been fought for throughout modern history. In the last century alone the soldiers of numerous wars and the suffragettes of many countries fought and died for enfranchisement. We should respect their sacrifice by voting.

People who know they will have to vote will take politics more seriously and start to take a more active role.

Compulsory voting is effective. In Australia the turnouts are as high as 98%!

Postal and proxy voting is available for those who are otherwise busy. In addition, when Internet voting becomes available in a few years everyone will be able to vote from their own home.

The Argument Against

The idea is nonsense. Political parties do try and capture the ‘working-class’ vote. The labour party shifted to the right in the UK because no-one was voting for it; the majority of the population, from across the social spectrum, no longer believed in its socialist agenda and it altered its policies to be more in line with the majority of the population. Low turnout is best cured by more education, for example, civics classes could be introduced at school. In addition, the inclusion of these ‘less-interested’ voters will increase the influence of spin as presentation becomes more important. It will further trivialise politics and bury the issues under a pile of hype.

Just as fundamental as the right to vote in a democracy is the right not to vote. Every individual should be able to choose whether or not they want to vote. Some people are just not interested in politics and they should have the right to abstain from the political process. It can also be argued that it is right that voices of those who care enough about key issues to go and vote deserve to be heard above those who do not care so strongly. Any given election will function without an 100% turnout; a much smaller turnout will suffice. The same is not true of juries which do require an 100% turnout all of the time! However, we can take a more general view by noting that even in a healthy democracy it is not surprising people should not want to do jury service because of time it takes, therefore it is made compulsory. However, in a healthy democracy people should want to vote. If they are not voting it indicates there is a fundamental problem with that democracy; forcing people to vote cannot solve such a problem. It merely causes resentment.

The failure to vote is a powerful statement, since it decreases turnout and that decreases a government’s mandate. By forcing those who do not want to vote to the ballot box, a government can make its mandate much larger than the people actually wish it to be. Those who fought for democracy fought for the right to vote not the compulsion to vote.

People who are forced to vote will not make a proper considered decision. At best they will vote randomly which disrupts the proper course of voting. At worst they will vote for extreme parties as happened in Australia recently.

The idea is not feasible. If a large proportion of the population decided not to vote it would impossible to make every non-voter pay the fine. If just 10% of the UK voters failed to do so the government would have to chase up about 4 million fines. Even if they sent demand letters to all these people, they could not take all those who refused to pay to court. Ironically, this measure hurts most those who the proposition are trying to enfranchise because they are least able to pay.

Many people don’t vote because they are busy and cannot take the time off. Making voting compulsory will not get these people to the ballot box if they are actually unable to do so.